PCR Pandemic: Interview with Virus Mania’s Dr Claus Köhnlein

“Dr Sam talks to Dr Claus Köhnlein (Co-Author, ‘Virus Mania’ ) about everything Covid-19. Diving deep into the reasons for excess mortality, Covid-19 PCR testing, parallels with the HIV epidemic, why coronavirus vaccines are being promoted and much more.”

One thought on “PCR Pandemic: Interview with Virus Mania’s Dr Claus Köhnlein

  1. I read and admired “Virus Mania” and agree that a healthy immune system based on a healthy lifestyle should be able to see off most viruses including covid19. Unfortunately, most victims of covid19 have been older people with compromised immune systems. The scary thing about covid19 is that your oxygen levels can drop to dangerous levels before you notice anything is wrong. What we have been seeing is people staying at home, on government advice, till they can hardly breathe then rushing to hospital and straight into ICU. Therefore Claus Köhnlein’s position that there is no treatment for covid19 and if you think you might have caught it you should go home and rest, is actually the same as the unhelpful government position which has led to much suffering precisely among precisely older and/or vulnerable people. Maybe they would have been fine if they had taken vitamin C, vitamin D, zinc, artemesia and other “alternative” treatments, but unfortunately it doesn’t occur to most people to take their health into their own hands. “Conventional” treatments do exist, but they should be prescribed early, ideally by your own doctor, and one of the sorry aspects of the covid19 debacle is that general practitioners have been kept out of the picture. Dr Köhnlein also adopts the mainstream position on hydroxychloroquine. Unbelievably he seems to think that HCQ is what killed so many people to begin with even though in France at least doctors were actually prohibited from prescribing it. He admits that the combination of HCQ, azithromycine and zinc seems to have been used sucessfully by the French doctor (actually Professor of Infectious Diseases) Didier Raoult. However he criticises Raoult for not carrying out randomised control studies first. Again, that is exactly what the French government is saying. Here we are in the midst of an epidemic, people are dying, you have a treatment that seems to work and the French government (and Köhnlein) are saying no, it must be tested against a placebo first. Köhnlein correctly draws attention to the dangers and the expense of the drug Remdesivir which was developed by the pharmaceutical giant Gilead as a potential treatment and there he and Raoult would be on the same side. However, studies denigrating HCQ were in general funded by Gilead which didn’t want its investment in Remdesivir to go to waste. Köhnlein doesn’t seem to notice the elephant in the room with regard to Raoult’s protocol: namely, that it is cheap. Nor does he seem to know about another treatment, ivermectin, also cheap and off patent, which seems to work even better.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s